Kaum Platz – wenig Geld. Gestaltung eines Innovation Lab für Hochschullehrende

16. Mai 2024
small spaces chalk board

Innovation braucht Raum. An der Universität Regensburg haben wir ein innovation lab geplant und gestaltet, das Lehrenden den notwendigen Raum für die Entwicklung von Kursen, Prüfungen und Studienprogrammen bietet. In einem Preprint (in englischer Sprache) zeigen wir, wie wir die Herausforderungen von begrenztem Raum und Budget durch kreatives Ressourcenmanagement gelöst haben.

Innovation is inherent to the higher education system. Driven by social and technological developments, current best practices in teaching and learning at universities have been evolving over decades. What is new is the pace of innovation cycles. Global issues, such as climate change or Artificial Intelligence are putting pressure on institutes and faculties to implement new curricula, teaching methods, and assessments. 

University leaders and education policymakers are responding to this with a range of policies and programmes. Such fundings provide valuable impetus for innovation in higher education. To implement ideas that lead to sustainable innovation, however, it takes an ongoing and permanent commitment and engagement of the academic community. Nerantzi (2016) therefore uses the analogy of gardening where – like an ecosystem – innovation in teaching “is more likely to flourish when individuals with shared interests and complementary skills interact in effective and creative ways with each other and with their environment” (p. 64).

Against this backdrop, bringing communities together and providing space to foster creativity might play a key role for innovation in higher education (Nerantzi & Thomas, 2019). Indeed, in recent years academic developers have been convening, facilitating, and maintaining communities of practice (Nerantzi, 2016), and have supported them with helpful resources (Hawelka & Bachmaier, 2023). However, little attention has been paid so far to the need for adequate space that – like a greenhouse for ecosystems (Nerantzi, 2016) – supports communities in designing innovative and creative pedagogical concepts (Winks, Green & Dyer, 2019).

Space as catalyst for innovation

Spaces can serve as “organisational catalysts for innovation” (Schiuma & Santarsiero, 2023). That is why leading innovative companies have been successfully setting up innovation labs for years. Meanwhile, there is a large body of evidence that such innovation labs can foster collaboration, creativity, and thus enhance the efficiency of innovative processes (Moultrie et al., 2007; Schiuma & Santarsiero, 2023). 

In a university context, however, only a few lighthouse projects (i.e. the Teaching Lab at the University of Delft) have assigned significance to such physical resources in order to foster innovative work among faculty. Of course, such architecturally sophisticated innovation labs based on industrial models are unaffordable for most public funded universities. However, as De Paoli and Ropo (2017) state, “creativity can flourish in different kinds of spaces with a variety of aesthetic features” (p. 164). What counts is the balancing between design and needs of the user.

Planning an innovation lab for faculty

At the University of Regensburg (Germany), we set up an innovation lab for faculty with very limited financial and physical resources. We had a fully-equipped videostudio (including several camcorders, microphones, a teleprompter, a lightboard and an interactive smartboard) and three fixed rooms at our disposal, ranging from 30 to 65 m² with a total of 156 m², as well as  a budget of 50.000 Euros. The following paragraphs describe the initial phases of this process according to Osario et al. (2019), from strategic intention to physical embodiment.

Strategic intention and conceptual considerations

The innovation lab was initialised in 2023 by the University’s executive board. It aims to support faculty with space (rooms, tangible and intangible infrastructure) for innovation of courses, study programmes, and exams.

Our conceptual considerations therefore started by identifying the different functions of spaces that support our strategic goals as well as (expected) users‘ needs. In a half-day workshop with the whole academic development team, we generated ideas on different functions and qualities the space should incorporate (Thoring, 2019). All ideas were collected, discussed, and prioritised. Table 1 summarises the results of this workshop.

Table 1. Identified function and qualities.

Process EnablerWhat processes should be enabled?Visualising ideas, recording and editing video and audio
Knowledge ProcessorWhat sources of knowledge should be processed?books, journals (best evidence)previous projects (good practice)shared knowledge (experience)
Social DimensionWhat social activities should be supported?collaboration, communication, teamwork, presenting ideas, feedback
Source of StimulationWhat atmosphere should be stimulated?“thinking outside the box”“getting out of the silo”
Indicator of organisational cultureWhat organisational culture should this space indicate?Innovative, nimble, supportive, empowering, dynamic

Based on the identified functions and qualities, the innovation lab was designed to encompass spaces (Thoring, 2019) for collaboration, for creation (making space), and for presentation. All spaces, including so-called intermission space (such as hallways that are not dedicated to a specific activity) should be designed to stimulate a creative atmosphere and indicate an innovative and empowering culture.

Physical embodiment

Space is not only functional, it is “a physical embodiment of their [people’s] desired modes of working” (Moultire et al., 2007, p. 53). Layout, furniture, and infrastructure in every space suggest a perceptible or hidden affordance, they induce or even prompt specific actions or behaviours (Young & Cleveland, 2022). Furniture and design elements are not just decorative or functional in a basic sense; they actively contribute to making the activities more effective, efficient, or engaging (Thoring, 2019). Based on these findings, the whole academic development team spent one month on (asynchronously) pooling ideas on design elements that support the intended qualities and functions listed above (3.1). We allocated them to the appropriate space, and simultaneously assessed the functions they might serve.

Table 2. Example from the collection of different design elements (Thoring, 2019) and their function. See https://lehrblick.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/elements.pdf for the full collection.

ElementDescriptionIdeaSpace | Function
Visible Toolsinspiration for potential processes Makerbox
Click and share
Making | Process enabler
Presentation | Knowledge processor


Drawing on this list, we equipped the innovation lab. Impressions of each space and selected design features are shown in the following sections.

Collaboration Space

One of the primary goals of our innovation space is to foster effective working as a team. For this reason, we have paid particular attention to the design of collaboration space. We selected layout and furniture to enhance and support communication (Figure 1a). Multi-functional furnishing allows our users to modify the arrangement in a way that suits their specific purposes and preferences (Figure 1b).

collaboration seating
Figure 1. a) Table with ergonomic seat variations; b) flexible building blocks and portable sockets

Different design elements inspire the users to share information and resources. Elements with raw structure and plants in the collaborative space indicate an experimental atmosphere and encourage out-of-the-box thinking.

Making Space

Our making space is tailored to enable two key processes (see 3.2): visualising ideas and producing media content. An oversized, mobile whiteboard system and some visible tools encourage collaborative development of ideas and their visualisation (Figure 2).

mobile room divider with writable surface
Figure 2. Mobile room divider with writable surface; elevated seats enable better visual engagement and more active participation.

The videostudio offers maximum flexibility to realise a wide variety of videos: it includes self-supporting, light, collapsible panoramic background with seamless surface, including different covers (including chroma key, white, black) and portable LED steady lights with different lightformers instead of fixed equipment. In addition, a voice booth is dedicated to creating high-quality audio recordings, such as podcasts or dubbing slides.

Presentation Space

The presentation space is designed for mutually providing input, as well as giving and receiving feedback. Its character is closely that of a seminar room, yet it incorporates several nimble and empowering features. A wireless conference system replaces the commonly used projectors. That enables participants to easily share their screen content with others by simply connecting their laptop to a USB port. This feature allows for a seamless switch from being a listener to taking on the role of a presenter (Figure 3a). The monitor wall is on wheels and can therefore be easily turned. With just a few simple steps, the technology disappears and opens space for oral- or poster presentation (Figure 3b).

conference system area
Figure 3a) setting with wireless conference system; b) technic-free setting with writable surfaces, utensils for poster presentation.

Intermission Space

Some of our intermission areas are seamlessly incorporated into the spatial concept to encourage spontaneous meetings, short coffee breaks, or for reflection on previous work (Figure 4). Various design elements in niches and on walls stimulate activities and provide inspiration. They indicate and bolster an innovative mindset and a dynamic mode of working.

pop up coffee area
Figure 4. A pop-up coffee bar serves as an anchor for casual meetings.

Reflection and lessons learnt

When setting up the innovation lab at our University we have been facing two main challenges: restricted space and a limited budget. To overcome the issue of limited space, we designed all rooms as flexrooms. The consequent use of multifunctional and movable furniture enables us to easily transform a maker’s space into a collaborative area, or a presentation space into a creative workshop. 

The more significant challenge, however, was working on a low budget. We had to allocate the majority of our budget to technical equipment (i.e. the audio booth or a conference system) and flexible furniture (such as moveable room divider or flexible building blocks). Not only did these gadgets consume nearly 90% of our budget, but they also fell outside the scope of the standard furnishings provided by the University. This meant that it required extensive, time-consuming research to find suitable and affordable fittings.

For smaller furnishing items, there was only a little money left, so we had to do a lot of it ourselves: we built a room divider, for example, from pallets that came with the delivery of the whiteboards (Figure 1b), we transformed an old desk into a large table for collaborative work with the help of a wooden board (Figure 1a), and we collected plants that were being given away on eBay. Since no facility service was available for such tasks, a significant portion of the work had to be completed during our free time. This is only doable when a larger team fully supports the project and actively contributes to its realisation. 

If we were to undertake a similar project again, we would dedicate at least half of a person’s workload for three months solely to coordinating all deliveries and assisting with the construction. The usage numbers of the innovation lab, however, prove that the effort was worth it: from its opening in September 2023, to the end of January 2024, a total of 16 communities, ranging from groups of 3 to 18 people, have used the lab for iterative sessions lasting between half a day and 4 days. They have used it to enhance exams, redesign self-study phases for students, create online learning modules, or simply to produce short videos. 

Given the brief operational period of our innovation lab, there is currently no evaluation data available. A systematic evaluation focusing on the usage process and innovation (Osario et al., 2019) is scheduled for this year and might lead to minor modifications. Direct and personal feedback from our users indicates that we have successfully created a space that effectively encourages collaborative and creative innovation in courses, study programs, and exams. The supportive and empowering design of the space helps faculty in breaking out of their traditional silo and in cultivating an innovative mindset. As one of our visitors remarked: it makes you feel like you’re on holiday while you’re working.

Welche Erfahrungen bei der Gestaltung von Lernräumen haben Sie gemacht? Teilen Sie Ihre Konzepte, Umsetzungen und (kreativen) Lösungen zur Gestaltung virtueller oder physischer (Lern-)Räume mit uns am 24. September am Tag der digitalen Lehre!


De Paoli, D., & Ropo, A. (2017). Creative workspaces – a fad or making real impact?“ Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 19(3), pp. 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-09-2016-0029

Hawelka, B., & Bachmaier, R. (2023, June). Non-formal faculty development. Conceptual considerations and implementation in practice. Proceeding on the Ninth International Conference on Higher Education Advances, Valencia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/HEAd23.2023.16178

Moultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., Haner, U., Janssen, S., & Van Der Lugt, R. (2007). Innovation spaces: Towards a framework for understanding the role of the physical environment in innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00419.x 

Nerantzi, C. (2016). Using Ecological Metaphors to Represent Professional Growth: Our extraordinary ‚Greenhouse‘, its creative academic gardeners and the growing of pedagogical ideas. Creative Academic, 5, 64–70. 

Nerantzi, C., & Thomas, B. (2019). What and who really drives pedagogic innovation?. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 2(3), 234–260.

Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Palominos, P., Peña, J. I., & Alfaro, M. (2019). Design and management of innovation laboratories: Toward a performance assessment tool. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.p12301

Schiuma, G., & Santarsiero, F. (2023). Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: A systematic literature review. Technovation, 123, 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102690 

Thoring, K. (2019). Designing Creative Space: A Systemic View on Workspace Design and its Impact on the Creative Process. [Dissertation, Delft University of Technology]. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:77070b57-9493-4aa6-a9a5-7fed52e4597

Winks, L., Green, N., & Dyer, S. (2020). Nurturing innovation and creativity in educational practice: Principles for supporting faculty peer learning through campus design. Higher Education, 80(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00468-3

Young, F., & Cleveland, B. (2022). Affordances, architecture and the action possibilities of learning environments: A critical review of the literature and future directions. Buildings, 12(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010076

Dieser Beitrag ist ein Preprint zum Tagungsband der 10th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’24). Er ist lizenziert unter CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Bitte zitieren Sie den Beitrag wie folgt: 

Hawelka, B.; Puppe, L.; Bachmaier, R. 2024. Small Space – Low Budget. Designing an Innovation Lab for Lecturers in Higher Education. In: 10th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’24). Valencia, 18-21 June 2024

Unsere Autoren stellen sich vor:

Birgit Hawelka

Dr. Birgit Hawelka ist wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsdidaktik an der Universität Regensburg. In Forschung und Lehre beschäftigt sie sich schwerpunktmäßig mit den Themenfeldern Lehrqualität und Evaluation. Ansonsten verfolgt sie neugierig alle Entwicklungen und Erkenntnisse rund um das Thema Hochschullehre.

Linda Puppe

Dr. Linda Puppe ist wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsdidaktik an der Universität Regensburg. Sie beschäftigt sich schwerpunktmäßig mit den Themenfeldern innovative Lehre und Motivation. Zudem interessiert sie sich für Entwicklungen im Bereich digitale Lernumgebungen.

Regine Bachmaier

Dr. Regine Bachmaier ist wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsdidaktik der Universität Regensburg. Sie unterstützt die Lehrenden im Bereich "Digitale Lehre", u.a. durch Workshops sowie individuelle Beratung. Daneben versucht sie, den Überblick über Aktuelles aus dem Bereich "Digitale Lehre" zu behalten und weiterzugeben.

Vielleicht gefällt Ihnen auch...

Keine Kommentare

Antwort hinterlassen

Diese Website verwendet Akismet, um Spam zu reduzieren. Erfahre mehr darüber, wie deine Kommentardaten verarbeitet werden.